Quote of the Day

A man who thinks of himself as belonging to a particular national group in America has not yet become an American.--Woodrow Wilson

we see americanism very well. you see what makes you a true american is to enjoy the freedoms of an American. We are more likely to hate someone for radical anti-american speech, than being of a particular religion. this is just a dumbass quote because what makes the US the US is that we accept people of all races,creeds,cultures and religions and they have the right to be connected to and to practice heir homeland or religion or ethnic traditions.

Quote of the Day

I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it--voltaire

Now , I know that Voltaire is a Frenchy,but i do love my first ammendment. And as i have said before the Bill of Rights seperates us from the communist society. People should be loyal to the people and should support the descisions of the government. in return the government should be act as employees to the people, the government must allow the people to disaprove of the government , and if the government can't do that them i've lost faith in government all together.

Quote of the day

That rifle on the wall of the laborer's cottage or working class flat is the symbol of democracy. It is our job to see that it stays there!---George Orwell

When only cops have guns, it's called a "police state" - Claire Wolfe

Hells yeah it is! Any law abiding citizen should be able to enjoy the Bill of Rights unless they are a poetential threat. You can argue that total free speech isn't allowed so neither should total 2nd ammendment rights, and that's right.But, frankly our founding fathers were pretty lazy when writing the Bill of Rights. The second quote is what seperates us from Communist china, guns are power, the power should not be in the hands of government officials it should be in the hands of American citizens.

Blackwater expelled

Okay im really pissed off right now so expect me to mispell words more than normal. just minutes ago the US security firm blackwater was expelled from Iraq. blackwater served as body gaurds to top US contracters,diplomats and engineers. the greatest insult is because they accidently killed 8 iraqi civillains, and that SOB shi'ite Maliki and his piece of crap ,iran loving government has the audacity to expell them from the nation, guess how many iraqis they saved? blackwater was a key componenet in rebuilding iraq, the Maliki govermnet isn't going anywhere, as much as i hate to say it but,with dumbass calls like this we should be more involved in iraqi government.

``Blackwater's independent contractors acted lawfully and appropriately in response to a hostile attack in Baghdad on Sunday,'' spokeswoman Anne E. Tyrrell said in a statement late Monday.

``Blackwater regrets any loss of life but this convoy was violently attacked by armed insurgents, not civilians, and our people did their job to defend human life.''

Now, i think that Iraq is weak and trying to rush the US out, this is an insult to America and must be defied. Blackwater must stay if iraq is supposed to sucseed

Jackass exploits our fallen for profit.

This week it came to my attention that some anti-war jackass wants to try and exploit our fallen troops for profit. This guy puts the names of fallen troops and outlines slogans like "Bush lied,they died" and "Bring home our surviving troops". Garbage. how dare he exploit the troops for his personal gains, claim that it's free speech,which it's not and then not even get expressed permission from the famlies of the soldiers,by the way illegal. How many of them do you think supported the war? the answer is most, and i don't think they would wan't there names worn on the back of some anti-war hippie? but some states have taken action to stop this kind of disgusting exploitation, Idaho and Louisiana have banned the shirt, and somehow sevral senators are strongly opposed. Here's the website if you want to send angry letters http://www.carryabigsticker.com/.
It's not free speech it's exploitation, there over there fighting for your free specch, so sit down and shut up.

Democrats on Moveon.org

Moveon.org,the anti-war website that launches tasteless smear campaigns against our heroes, holds a "virtual town hall meeting" with just about every democratic candidate on april 9th 2007. I have postred several times that i am angered by the democrats attempt to either ignore or support these anti-americans over at moveon.org. But this is not what i specificlly wanted to talk about today, i wanted to say how dissapointed i am in the NY times for helping Moveon with posting this treason, news reports are saying that the NYT assisted Moveon.org finacally, now first of all im pissed at them for posting any political opinios in their newspaper, second im pissed at them for not putting conservative groups ads in and thirdly for finacilly supporting moveon.org. ive said all of this before, but this is total crap, the mainstream media should, if they wish to express horrible biased, have it be Pro-govt. and as ive had said yestreday, it's not an attack on america it's an attack on all Americans.

On the issues, lightning round

Most of the candidates have a "on the issues" link on their sites, so i decided to do my own on the issues, lightning round.

Spending: Cut the crap, ie uneeded branches, they have operating expenses people.
Iraq: Get out by Jan. 2010, that should be enough time there, a cut and run would be a wate of 8 years.
Abortion: legal in Rape and life-threatning cases ONLY.
Vetrans: if anyone deserves Healthcare it's them, Up spending.
Border Security: Promote legal immigartion, but let the national gaurd do their job, protect the nation.
Second ammendment: Background checks and tighter security for offenders. everyone else, lower restrictions it's your right.
Helthcare: it's a buisness, make it affordable and help people afford it, don't socialize it.
Poverty: some programs need to be created, anti-poverty is one of them.

American Hero, under attack,and the where are the Democrats?

Recently Sen. John Cornyn demanded that a far left group denounce the treason posted in the NY Times, unfortunatly he was ruled out of order.The anti-Petraeus ad was just another shot from the far left to attempt to sway people over to believe this war is not winnable. It was not an attack on the GOP or an attack on the president it was an attack on an American hero David Petraeus. To you America-hating SOBs over at Moveon.org, when you attack our military it is not an attack on a political party, it is an attack on the heroes who put there lives on the line and often giving the last full measure of devotion so you can have your "expression of free speech" people who have so little respect for the military should just leave the country.While the liberal candidates are afraid to speak out aginst anti-military propaganda the Republicans have been forceful in there defense of our heroes. Just this morning Mitt Romney said:"Like the men he commands, he is risking his life to protect our freedoms here at home. We should not prejudge him or his testimony, or give him anything less than the full respect he deserves." John McCain said:Now he is the target of a despicable attack in one our nation's most visible newspapers. No matter where you stand on the war, we should all agree on the character and decency of this exceptional American. I would hope that the Democratic Congressional leadership and Democratic presidential candidates would also join me in publicly condemning this kind of political attack ad and the organization responsible for it in the strongest terms possible." and I completly agree with him, it would be insulting if the Democratic congress didn't at least discourage this kind of pre-judging and hatemongering, as i have stated before: This man put his life on the line for your freedoms and to insult him is an insult to America and every American.

Quote Of the Day

In the end, that's what this election is about. Do we participate in a politics of cynicism or a politics of hope? --Barack Obama

Let's get this straight, the "Politics of Hope" is classic idealism on steriods. When Woodrow Wilson made his "Fourteen Points" speech, he set up a flawed belief system. What is ideal should always be driven for, but we must stay realistic. In his book Mr. Obama states that We are all consitutionalists, FLAT OUT LIE. While the book is titled "The Audacity of Hope", the concept of "Politics of Hope" is expensive, unrealistic and is certainly audacious.

Quote of the day

George Washington is the only president who didn't blame the previous administration for his troubles. ~Author Unknown

Exactly, and that is the problem with the Govt. today and throughout amrican history. I may seen very partisan,im not running for office, and therfore don't need to lie about my views. I have a huge problem increbible partisan politics, originally the US was based on the Republican-Democrat, when did that stop? the reason I like certain candidates is because they would be willing to reach across the aisle. And candidates like Clinton are going to "re-break" America, and are not anywhere near is experiance to be able to "Fix" it.

Quote of the day

I want to be a champion for the people I have fought for all my life - regular people. ---John Edwards

Bull!! John Edwards, that universal healthcare plan that would force people to go to the doctor regulary, that seems pretty pally with the big drug companies. And might I just ask you who can claim to be a champion of the people and gets a $400 haircut, we need a real american, not this American Socialist.

Quote Of The Day

The great questions of the day will not be settled by means of speeches and majority decisions but by iron and blood. ---Otto Von Bismark
Yes, I know that Otto Von Bismark was a extreme conservative. That is no reason for him not to have brilliant quotes. This suggests that we should forget diplomacy, I don't think so. I think that he is trying to convey that diplomacy is an effective tool, but saying is not nearly as effective as having several thousand troops at their front door to back it up. When it comes to getting things done hard power is the one true trump card.

Good vs Evil

I would like to take a post to defend OUR president. Many attack Mr. Bush for saying that the struggle in the Middle East is a fight between good and evil. People say that it is more than black and white. that the situation in the Middle East is complex, with layers of religious and social barriers that prevent us from victory. and by good and evil i dont mean America vs Islam or Secular v Religious. I mean Life versus death. Those who i catogorize in "death", such as Osama do not value lives. What Osama and the rest of the extremists are doing is attacking civillians for living as free people, sending thousands of young men to sacrifice themselves and kill others in the process for there misguided attempts at a perfect world, The Qur'an may be interpretted in different ways, and does not preach violence. but those who are in positions of power and believe that it preaches violence, they pose the greatest threat to freedom . They preach the destruction of the United States, Isreal and all of our allies. Those who fall into the "life" category are those who have resisted extremism, to the young Iraqi men who have the courage to go against death in a land where death is so common, i appluad you. to the US military service men and woman, i applaud you for putting your lives on the line for our liberties . Life believes in free speech,freedom of religion, freedom to live and to make the best of our lives. Support our troops, God bless America.

Quote Of The Day

I haven't been able to post frequently any more. I do have a little free time where I can find a quote and write a few sentences on it. Here's my first of many, hopefully

"The pieces of the bodies of infidels were flying like dust particles. If you would have seen it with your own eyes, you would have been very pleased, and your heart would have been filled with joy." ---Osama

See, this is why surrender is not an option. these people rejoice at death and especially the death of any American. He wants a United Islamist State. We have not gotten ourselves into this mess there reason for wanting our death is merely our existance. This is not the next Nam, this is a whole new type of war. One that we can't back down from. Support our troops.

These Colors Don't Run.

First of all, to the four people who have posted on my page, thanks. Sorry for not posting in a while. Anyway, recently Osama bin laden realeased a video to the U.S. Obviously in conjuction with the 6th aniversary of the 9/11 attacks. Just like in 2004 osama has made more threats against the US and ger allies. Frankly it's digusting how some people can comprehend pulling out of the Middle East right now and stop the search for Osama. In the 1990's he sent the US videos saying that he would attack, we did not heed his words and we were attacked multiple times. He said he would continue attacks against the US until every American converted to Wahabism (anti-western, anti-secular,anti-free speech). Now, with our options be fight or surrunder I see no reason to surrender, nor should any logical human being. The United States will not be brought to her knees by Islamic radicals. We were built on the principles that life is sacred and freedom is to be valued. In their culture, it is the opisite, life can be thrown away and freedom is what a cleric tells you. To surrender and pull out now would be to go against those principles. THESE COLORS DON'T RUN!!!

Great! But we know this will never happen.

Just yesterday morning the US decieded to lift sanctions on North Korea and remove it from the terrorist sponsoring states list. this came after a two day meeting in Geneva in which North Korea agreed to shut down it's main nuclear reactor by 2008 in exchange for food and oil. Of course as every Human on earth knows that North Korea will not meet this deadline for shutting down it's opperations. It would be astounding if we see it dismantled by the end of 2008. to make this even more apparent the head of the North Korean negotiating team, Kim Kye-gwan didn't even mention the end of year deadline in a post negotiation news confrence. Not to mention that North korea has a horrible record when it comes to doing what the US or UN tells them to. John Bolton, Fmr. ambassador to the UN wrote“There is still simply no evidence that Pyongyang has made a decision to abandon its long-held strategic objective to have a credible nuclear-weapons capability,” Yes,I am rooting for North Korea to meet the deadline so the Bush administration can finally claim to be making diplomatic progress abroad that no previous administration has been able to achieve (despite it's high cost).

Larry Craig

I will just report on this issue and try to leave my opinion out after this sentence "That's what gay bathroom sex get's you Craig".Larry Craig looked hesitant to admit his failure as a man and his resignation effective september 30th. He thanked his family for going through the horrible grief he put them through, he thanked the Govenor and the people of idaho.Then every one he thanked he also apoligized to. He said he was a distraction to the congress and nation, he stated that we are at war for our freedom and this was to much a distraction for the congress and the American people.

Iranian Lies

Yesterday the Iranian Ambassador to the IAEA was interviewed by CNN reporter Fionnula Sweeny. The Iranian Ambassador says that Iran is " the master of enrichment technology" and that the US and other western dtates are unfairly judging them. Garbage!!! we are fairly concerned with Iranand we are not afraid oth them rather irritated. the Iranians have defied several sanctions since the turn of the century. He says we should cope with the fact theat they are the masters of nuclear enrichment and they only enrich nuclear material for peaceful purposes. He says that his state wil be under the eye of the IAEA, despite the fact that they have defied the IAEA and UN officials accsess to the state for years.While lying at least 6 times in the video, the ambassador made a very good point by saying the battle will be in Vienna and through diplomacy rather than on the battlefields. That is 1/2 true I would agree that the US is willing to negotiate from Vienna and New York, but if Iran does anything agressive the US would be ready to take the fight to the streets of Tehran. He said that the Sanctions had no legal basis and that Iran was flexible and agreeable to deal with the sanctions. To see the video view Iranian Lies on my homepage or through http://edition.cnn.com/video/#/video/world/2007/08/30/intv.iaea.iran.ambassador.cnn. Thank you and please email or comment.

Make It Clear

The reason why many Republicans are so addamently opposed to Hillary is not just because of her policy, but because her husband didn't react to terrorist attacks on the US. the first WTC attack, the USS cole and the embassy bombings in east Africa. Recently Mr.Romney made a statement saying that he would react in a "very dramatic and clear way" if a nuke were to be detonated in a US city . He said the reason we have thousands of warheads is to use them if we ever need to. We are in a complex world and the people whp wish to cause us harm need to know they can not attack the US and get away with it. The last time we were attacked, we reacted to quickly and without a plan and we paid for it. The the only way to make sure that the US isn't attacked is to make sure that people can't attack us. he spoke specifically to the Iranians, saying that "A nuclear weapon is not a source of Pride, but Peril." and assuring us that he would tighten sanctions on Iran. "And I would never shrink from protecting the American nation, the American people, nor shrink from retaliation if somebody used something as awful as a nuclear device. We will be safe." his speech is direct oppistite of the democratic candidates saying he would protecet america as opposed to saying they would just correct the (many) mistakes of the previous administration.

The Great Recall Of China

For a country of 1.3 billion people shipping their goods all over the world china has horrible quality control issues. all of us have heard of the Mattel toy recall. Now the Chinese government has made moves to prevent another antifreeze-toothpaste , lead toy paint or tainted milk powder incident. This attempt launched friday is the first real attempt at quality control for China. Even though this is a step forward for China, the majorly US corporations are taking a big hit here. It's a major issue when over 2 million toys have to be recalled, assume about $10-15 each. That's at least a $20,000,000 loss for Mattel, not to include shipping and distribution costs. If we want to be competitive with China werre going to need to keep ourselves open to their products and turn this into an oppurtunity rather than ging the way of the Soviet Union and isolating ourselves. as long as the Chinese maintain quality products this should be the greatest oppurtunity for the United States of our existance.

We Can't Win This Alone

The top US commander in Afghanistan reported today that we cannot win the war with just our military due to the ideology that drives the insurgents. I agree, however military is our only option. Peace talks should always be an option, but negotiting and compromising with terrorists is unlikly. "These people have attacked our homeland and want to eliminate the freedoms that we enjoy" is our military's position while the enemy's position is "They have secularized the world and fallen under the sway of a false God, as long as this culture exists it is an affront to Allah". like I said it is very unlikly diplomacy will work with no common ground to be found anywhere. It was also reported that Ghulam Ghori was killed in an skirmish between coalition troops and extremists. Ghori was a leading aid to the Taliban when they occupied Afghanistan and this should be treated as a victory.

Romney the Republican

I endorsed Mike Huckabee just yesterday and I stand by that. But I also like Romney. You see Huckabee has the morals and values that a President should have, and he would have made a great founding father. But he does lack the economic prowess and fiscal conservatism to fix our debt. Huckabee did fix the debt in Arkansas turning a 200 million defecit to a Billion dollar surplus. Mitt Romney created a 800 million dollar surplus from a 600 million defecit. The basis of the Republican party was originaly to supply services to people while using fiscal discipline, but in the past few years, we have lost our way. We need to pick and chose what is essential to firts protecting America. He signed the taxpayer protection pact and agreed not raise taxes, saying that with higher taxes comes higher more spending. He is a strong supporter of the free market saying"We have to keep our markets open or we go the way of Russia and the Soviet Union, which is a collapse." Yet another reason i agree with Mr.Romney is his 5 point plan for Iran. Funny story, as a history final last spring i had to write about fixing America's middle eastern troubles, and my 4 of my 5 points for Iran were the exact same as Mr. Romney's and might i add, before i even knew he existed. Tighten economic sanctions, isolate the Iranians and shut them put from diplomacy, I disagree with arming arab states but i would be glad to work with them to prevent Iran from obtaining a weapon, make sure that they know we are willing to react agressivly to any agression from Iran and finally to make this a broad worldwide effort to stop extreme Islam.Extremists cannot be allowed to prevail, their intention is to overthrow secular government and form one Islamist caliphate with eradicating the Jewish people and destroying the US and her allies. of course as with any candidate i have my issues, he wishes to arm moderate nations to aide us in the fight with extremists, think that that is major flaw and i have posted my warnings about arming our tentative allies before. and on healthcare he wishes to see every American with healthcare and health insurance, every American without insurance causes healthcare to cost more for the Americans with health insurance, how do we fix this? make health care more affordable, the money that insured Americans have given to those without healthcare is already there, cant that just be allocated to programs to help them buy health insurance . Thank you

Mistake!!!

America has made several mistakes over our years of existance, but the one i think was most influential was choosing who to arm poorly... for example the Islamic militias in Afghanistan in 1980 to fight the Soviets, where Osama rose to power. Who would go onto attack the US and be the most problematic fugitive in US history. Arming Saddam to fight Iran in the 80's...Then we fough against them in 1991 and for a very short time in 2003. My point is if we don't be careful who were arming to avoid fighting we may soon may be strengthening our next enemy. If war is truly nessecary it should be fought by America and her allies, not by the local group of insurgents. For a while we believed the Afghans were our allies, we though the Iraqis were our allies, who knew they wern't. I prefer not to quote communists but as Stalin once said "Ideas are as powerful as guns and we do not give them guns, why should we give them ideas" Well Mr Stalin maybe you should tell the people on Capitol that. any comments, objections etc email me or post a comment.

Turkish Delights

This Post is by no means to says that i am happy with the Turks, it was the only witty title i could come up with. Well, yesterday Turkey elected their new President, Abdullah Gul. The intresting thing is that just today he said he wanted to be part of a "democratic,secular,social state" and that is where i red flag him. Can we really trust the Turks to be a democratic state when they have laws like this:A person who explicitly insults being a Turk, the Republic or Turkish Grand National Assembly, the penalty to be imposed shall be imprisonment for a term of six months to three years." It also states that "Expressions of thought intended to criticize shall not constitute a crime." No, we can't .Yes, having an election where a general wasn't elcted is a stepforward. A secular state, there seems to be nothing wrong with that though. Aside from Gul being involved with Islamist politics since age 16, there is no way that the secular army is going to let him say anything moderatly Islamist. To say anything is definite is tough with Turkey but I can assure you if Gul makes any move too extreme he won't be alive for much longer. You see in America the media sways people's opinions, in places like Turkey your opinion is swayed by weather you wish to live or not. thus said,the military can kill you, the military is secular, if you are alive, you are secular. But if Gul came find that perfect balance between being a military lapdog and getting killed, I think turkey is looking towards brighter times.

Flag Burning

Early this morning I posted on a forum asking a question to forumites "Should it be legal to burn the United States flag?" as i returned to my computer 10 hours later, i was shocked to see over 100 posts, as i read every single one of the posts, i got arguments ranging from "Burning the flag says nothing about which party is in control, it's our State." and "Independence Day ...Memorial Day ...Veterans Day. Our flag is sacred and deserves respect/protection. Plenty other ways to exercise free speech." to "Some people are just extremely angry with our country and our government and that's how they express it. Let it burn." When I though deeply about this issue I came to a conclusion "As the Consitution is the symbol of modern democracy, the flag is the symbol of the the United States , the home of modern democracy. As Americans it is our duty to honor, respect and defend the flag. But when you honor the flag you protect a person's right to not honor the flag. So,in conclusion Yes, you should have the right to burn the flag if you so chose, but the fact that you would to goes against the freedoms that we enjoy as Americans."
As always,If you have any comments about this particuly passion invoking topic please comment.

Nuclear Holocuast?

Yesterday President Bush warned us about what he believed would happen, should Iran be allowed to obtain a nuclear weapon. He stated what he has throughout the last 6.5 years saying that the forces of freedom must prevail or the forces of extremism will succeed. Yes, it would be horrific to start a war with two nuclear armed powers on opposing sides. However I don’t believe Iran would have the audacity to attempt to launch at a city belonging to the US or her allies knowing that the consequences would be great. God forbid we ever enter a conflict with the Islamic republic; it could be treated as a classic war. What discerns a war from a classic war? Well, what we are fighting in Iraq and Afghanistan is a war. As one can see, the enemies we have faced in the last several decades have all refrained from open field combat(except Saddam in 1991, who was swiftly defeated)with the US and for good reason. Over the last several decades we have been fighting guerillas, insurgents, and Vietcong. Should war arise between Iran and the US, I am convinced that a nuclear attack would take years to escalate to.

Tehran? More like Terroran

Hello everyone, and by everyone I mean the one person who commented on my blog. As of two weeks ago the U.S officially designated the “Iranian Revolutionary Guard” as a global terrorist organization. Now making it a terror organization allows the good people at the CIA to interrupt business operations and financing. All of us know that the CIA has been doing this for years, but now, they don’t have to do it under the table. We all should know that the IRGC is the military elite of Iran; it should also come as no surprise that they have been known for supporting terrorist groups specifically arming Shiite Militias in Iraq,and the Taliban in Afghanistan and Hezbollah in Lebanon. However one strange thing is this may actually be a very bad move on the State Department’s part, think about it. The CIA has never needed authorization to do something and officially putting the IRGC on a list only inches us closer to a possibly catastrophic war with Iran. By naming the IRGC a terrorist organization we heighten tensions that would not have been raised.

(?) Mike Huckabee

I like Mike. Micheal Huckabee was not seen as an actual contender for the Presidency until he came in second in the Iowa straw poll. While still being far behind in the polls I believe that the only way that America can recover is a realitivley non partisan President. I wouldnt say that Mr. Huckabee is non-partisan, to be a true non-partisan in America today and to be recognized as a seroius candidate is impossible.Therfore I would say that Mr. Huckabee is Bi-Polar. Yes, laugh now, but I mean it. Huckabee maintains the policy of a classic social conservative, and while a deeply religious man believes that morals rather than religion should be taught in our schools. He has raised minimum wage in his state and increased taxes suggesting the rumor is true that he is in fact a fiscal Liberal. However, he has mentioned several times on live television his support for eliminating the IRS and implementing the "FairTax". While a complete mystery a person like Mr.Huckabee would be good for America.Unfortunatly for all of us, Mr Huckabee isn't made of money(cough...Romney..cough) and cannot run a campaign of a caliber that could get him elected without huge amounts of help from us the voters.

Tough Calls

This post is for everyone who claims that Mr. Bush is the worst President ever due to his handling of the war on terror. Presidents who face tough calls regarding the security of the US are always critised. Take for example, Fmr. President Truman had the lowest public approval rating in US history, but does that make him a poor leader, certainly not. Throughout American history many people have had issues with those who use excessive force. This use of excessive force was against Japan at the end of WWII. However now military historians and scholars are estimating the cost of invading Japan would be over 1,000,000 military lives and up to 3,000,000 civillian casualties. People could claim that the sending of over 200,000 men and women to Iraq and Afghanistan is equally overagressive for a conflict of that magnitude. No, it's not, i personally think that the invasions were the most humanitarian option to adress the threat sufficiantly. We deposed Saddam's regime, but unfortunatly now we are trapped in role as a "global policeman" due to the poor information, lack of a organised plan and no replacement government. The tough calls that the government made pertaining to the war on terror were all required.

Ron Paul?

I have noticed over the previous months that Ron Paul's actual support is overtly trumped by the support that he has on the internet, this question is to all supporters of Ron Paul, Why? While he is obviously a Republican, with his opposition to the ICC, strong belief in the 2nd ammendment and small government, he has incredibly Democratic tendencies. well, for one He voted against the Patriot Act and has voted against his party multiple times. This leads me to believe that the internet wants an Non-partisan president with a strong belief system and trustable morals. Ron Paulers, I want to know what discerns Ron Paul from any other Republican. and i have heard a lot of uproar from the people who say he would eliminate the IRS and replace it with nothing. I would also like to ask, how is it possible for our troops to get funding when there overseas and at home,our children to be educated in a satifactory manner and our public works to remain upkept without anything to replace the IRS.

Obama Girl

Yes, yes you have probably heard of Obama Girl by now, but i'll go through writing about her. Obama Girl was the brain child of Dan Relles. Model Amber Lee Ettinger,vocalist Leah Kaufman and music producer Rick Rredrique assisted Relles and the crew of http://www.barelypolitical.com/ in creating the video, it can be found at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wKsoXHYICqU.